<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royalty-Free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.setzler.net/2007/01/30/royalty-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.setzler.net/2007/01/30/royalty-free/</link>
	<description>Photographic Arts</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mcmurma</title>
		<link>http://www.setzler.net/2007/01/30/royalty-free/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>mcmurma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.setzler.net/2007/01/30/royalty-free/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Hey John,

I tried my hand at alamy at about the same time I'm guessing you went online with istock (september '05). I only put about the same amount of images up and my return has been $1000 less. I have made enough to get one check (3 sales) that was around $400. And that was last May. Not thing since.

Now, I don't know what this tells us, exactly. It's hard to draw any truly meaningful comparison because our images were different (and I'll concede that your images do look more commercially viable--mine were a lot of flotsam) but it does seem that istock is a quite lucrative option on the whole. Certainly not the "complete ripoff'' so many have complained about.

I admit, I was opposed to the "idea" of being paid low rates for images, albiet with a larger number of sales. But my thinking is starting to reverse. It seems that sales have been weak for many of late, macro or micro, and I plan to throw a few at istock to see what happens.

-Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John,</p>
<p>I tried my hand at alamy at about the same time I&#8217;m guessing you went online with istock (september &#8216;05). I only put about the same amount of images up and my return has been $1000 less. I have made enough to get one check (3 sales) that was around $400. And that was last May. Not thing since.</p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t know what this tells us, exactly. It&#8217;s hard to draw any truly meaningful comparison because our images were different (and I&#8217;ll concede that your images do look more commercially viable&#8211;mine were a lot of flotsam) but it does seem that istock is a quite lucrative option on the whole. Certainly not the &#8220;complete ripoff&#8221; so many have complained about.</p>
<p>I admit, I was opposed to the &#8220;idea&#8221; of being paid low rates for images, albiet with a larger number of sales. But my thinking is starting to reverse. It seems that sales have been weak for many of late, macro or micro, and I plan to throw a few at istock to see what happens.</p>
<p>-Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
